AN OPEN LETTER TO TATAY DIGS

Dear Tatay Digs,

Malaki talaga ang galit at takot mo of powerful, assertive and smart women, ano po? From Sen. Leila, former CJ Sereno, Maria Ressa, and Ombudsman Carpio-Morales to Sen. Risa, UN Special Rapporteur Agnes Callamard, ICC Prosecutor Fatou Bensouda, pati na rin si Sister Patricia Fox — all of them experienced being on the receiving end of your infamous misogynistic and sexist remarks.

Ngayon, it’s VP Leni’s turn. For the nth time.

If you don’t really trust her, like what you said, bakit ninyo siya in-appoint to that sensitive position, in the first place? Ah, oo nga pala, you just did so dahil napikon ka sa kanya for calling your drug war a failure. And because you didn’t expect that she would accept your offer/challenge/bait.

Una po, Tatay Digs, VP Leni only mimicked your early statement about the failure of your much-touted drug war. So why did you take offense when the VP said that it is obviously not working?

Pangalawa po, prior to her appointment, you said, and I quote, “The moment she accepts…Anything that has to do with drugs and criminality, you ask her. I will appoint. Let’s see. I won’t interfere anymore.”

So, ano ang tawag sa ginagawa mo ngayon if that is not interfering? Full cooperation?

Pangatlo, ano po ang masama sa paghingi ni VP Leni ng list of High-Value Targets if she deems it necessary to ensure the arrest of the big-time drug personalities and drug lords? Unfair nga naman po kasi kung puro small-time drug peddlers at users lang ang mapaparusahan through tokhang, di ba?

Spox Panelo said before that Malacañang has no problem giving VP Leni access to intelligence reports on the drug war because those records are “open.” Na wala naman daw itinatago ang pamahalaan. He also said that, as ICAD co-chair, VP Leni will become the “boss” of the law enforcement agencies tasked to curb the drug menace. “She can do what she wants, and she will have the support of the entire members of the Cabinet, as well as the agencies under her.” Talaga lang po, ha?

71322808_2565931246822774_2131043513918291968_o

Pang-apat, bakit masyado yata kayong triggered sa pagri-request ni VP Leni for that list? May gusto po ba kayong protektahan? Kayo nga dati, kahit unverified, inilalabas mo sa media ang narco lists at drug matrices, di ba?

According to Sen. Lacson, the VP, as the country’s anti-drug czar and the second-highest official of the land, should have access to that controversial list. In fact, she should have the necessary security clearance.

Also, according to EO No. 34, her position as Vice President entitles her to a seat to the National Security Council. Thus, she does not need a Cabinet position or your permission, for that matter, to have access to such information.

Panglima po, you said that you can’t trust VP Leni because she is from the other side of the political fence. Sabagay, you’d rather trust the likes of Faeldon, Albayalde, Lapeña, the Marcoses, the Arroyos, Estrada, Revilla, pati na rin si Quiboloy, at marami pang iba, di po ba?

Pang-anim, you said that you’re afraid that she will use that information to jeopardize the security of the state.

Patawa ka talaga, Tatay Digs.

Di ba, ikaw nga ang tahasang nagbibenta ng bansa natin sa China? You allowed the unrestricted entry of Chinese nationals, businesses, gambling operations, unscrupulous contractors, onerous deals and “friendly” loans, overpaid workers that don’t pay taxes, smuggled goods, tons of shabu, bullying of our fishermen and coastguard, oil and gas explorations of our marine areas, telecom company that is potentially a threat to our security, island-grabbing, black sand mining, giant clam harvesting, at kung ano-ano pang mga illegal activities.

Ikaw ang tunay na traydor sa bayan, Tatay Digs. Licking the ass of Xi Jinping is your favorite pastime nga, di ba? Kaya, sana, don’t you dare point a finger at VP Leni. Psychological projection ang tawag sa ginagawa mong ‘yan.

Lastly, when you issued VP Leni a threat in case her mouth misbehaves, I almost fell off my chair and rolled on the floor laughing. Nahiya po ako bigla sa iyong filthy, lying and uncontrollable mouth, Tatay Digs. Talagang ikaw pa ang pupuna sa bibig ng iba? Ibang klase ka talaga!

Next time you go AWOL again, try to reflect din po, ha? At, paminsan-minsan, makikinig ka rin sa pamangkin mo. 😉

Natatawa sa iyo at sa iyong mga minions,

Ang Taumbayan

VP LENI, WEIGHED BUT FOUND WANTING?!?

When VP Leni critized his fake drug war, and certain that she will not accept his offer, Duterte appointed her to be a drug czar. It was a challenge which was meant to mock her.

“Okay, you have many ideas I’ll appoint you to be the drug czar.”

When VP Leni unexpectedly accepted the appointment, and to show everyone that he is a good appointing officer, Duterte promised her a Cabinet seat and his full support. But before the VP could even start, Duterte’s minions and sycophants bombarded her with hateful remarks and statements undermining her capabilities.

“I will swear her in as a Cabinet member so that she will have the authority.”

Bong Go: Ibi-baby lang ni VP Leni ang mga drug lords.

Bato dela Rosa: Hindi pwedeng magpacute-cute lang si VP Leni sa giyerang ito.

Alan Peter Cayetano: VP Leni is starting on the wrong mouth. She has turned Operation Tokhang into Operation All-Talk.

When VP Leni started to work with utmost diligence that her sensitive position required, even recommending to other ICAD members to rethink their campaign to avoid the senseless killings, and meeting with the UN Office on Drugs and Crime, the US Embassy officers, the Church, and other institutions and groups that have been critical of the drug-related killings, Duterte said that he didnt trust the VP. Said statement was apparently triggered by the erroneous info he received that VP Leni invited UN to investigate the drug war.

“And I am sorry because I said you only realize that it is false news when the news comes out.”

When VP Leni asked for the list of the High-Value Targets, all hell broke loose. Duterte and his minions panicked.

“Vice President Leni Robredo is a ‘scatterbrain’ with ‘kneejerk’ impulses whom I would not appoint to the Cabinet and entrust with sensitive information about the state. She might use that information to jeopardize the security of the state”

No need for VP Leni to have access to high-value target list. – PDEA Chief Aaron Aquino, PNP OIC Archie Gamboa, House Committee on Dangerous Drugs chair Robert Ace Barbers, Senate Pres. Tito Sotto

When VP Leni remained unaffected by all the bullying that she had been relentlessly subjected to, and it was apparent that she was getting all the attention and praises over the re-directed drug war, Duterte, like a petulant child, fired her.

“I have yet to see the Vice President working as an ICAD or ICAD chair, co-chair, and there is a product of their discussion.”

thumbnail (4)

Spox Salvador Panelo is now weaving all kinds of lies to justify his master’s unjustifiable decision to give VP Leni the ax.

VP Leni is allegedly incompetent. Apparently, the Palace has a different definition of the word. Competence for them defines the likes of Faeldon, Lapeña, Uson, Albayalde and, now, the two “rising stars in Philippine politics,” Bong Go and Phisgoc’s Alan Peter Cayetano.

VP Leni allegedly committed missteps. If redirecting the drug war down the path devoid of senseless killings, and demanding for the list of drug lords who she wished to run after are considered missteps, then so be it.

VP Leni was allegedly grandstanding. The Palace should have realized that the position they gave the VP and the circumstances surrounding it were virtually magnets for attention. It was hardly VP Leni’s fault that the media were constantly tailing her, curious as to how far she’d be allowed to run the show.

She was allegedly weighed but found wanting. This may be true because the qualities they are looking for in their appointees –obedience, docility, and the ability to look the other way– can never be found in VP Leni.

Everyone knows that VP Leni was not fired due to any of those reasons.
She was fired –and appointed– for one reason, and one reason alone. Politics.

An Open Letter to senator Bato Dela Rosa (about a second chance for Ex-Mayor Antonio Sanchez)

Dear senator Bato,

Ang sabi mo, marapat lang na bigyan ng “second chance” si Ex-Mayor Antonio Sanchez, lalo pa nga’t ang nakarating na impormasyon sa iyo is that he is now “a changed man.”

Ito po ang tugon ko sa inyo.

19 years old si Eileen Sarmenta when she was kidnapped, raped countless times, and brutally murdered in 1993. Ang master mind, ang dating Mayor ng Caluan Laguna na si Antonio Sanchez, ay napipintong pakawalan mula sa kulungan dahil di-umano sa kanyang good conduct.

1

Before I shout for everyone to hear na si Antonio Sanchez is a monster –isang demonyo na nagkatawang-tao!—let me refresh your memory. Balikan natin kung ano nga ba ang mga naganap noong gabi ng June 28, 1993.

Eileen and her confraternity brod, Allan Gomez, were inside a Tamaraw van na naka-park sa harap ng Cafe Amalia hindi kalayuan mula sa UP Los Baños kung saan sila parehong nag-aaral. 8 lalaki, mga tauhan ni Mayor, na lulan ng isang ambulansya ang pwersahang tumangay kina Eileen at Allan pati na rin sa sinasakyan nilang van, binusalan ang kanilang mga bibig, itinali ang kanilang mga kamay, at dinala sila sa farm na pag-aari ni Mayor.

Ayon sa isang tauhan, nakilala at natipuhan ni Mayor si Eileen matapos siyang interbyuhin ng huli para sa isang school paper. Ang kanilang salita when they presented Eileen to Mayor Sanchez, “Mayor, ito ang regalo namin sa iyo. Ang babaeng natipuhan mo.”

Ipinasok sa resthouse ang dalawang teenagers –si Eileen, diretso sa kwarto ni Mayor, habang si Allan ay walang-habas na binugbog ng mga tauhan nito hanggang sa mawalan ng ulirat.

Bandang ala-una ng madaling-araw nang pahilang inilabas ng resthouse si Eileen. Magulo ang buhok, may busal sa bibig, nakatali ang mga kamay, at walang pang-ibabang saplot. Lumabas si Mayor at pinasalamatan ang kanyang mga tauhan for their gift. “Tapos na ako sa kanya. She’s all yours,” ang nakangising dagdag niya.

Isinakay sa van ang dalawa. Nakasunod sa van ang ambulansya.

En route to their destination, nagpagewang-gewang ang van, tapos, may narinig na putok ng baril mula sa loob. Huminto ito sa gilid ng kalsada at hinilang palabas ng sasakyan ang duguang si Allan. Inihagis siya sa tabi at muling binaril gamit ang armalite.

Doon iniwan ang kanyang katawan ng umarangkadang ambulansya at van.

2
Eileen Sarmenta and Allan Gomez

Nang marating nila ang kanilang destinasyon na isang sugarcane field o tubuhan, sinabi ng isang tauhan, “Turbohin na rin natin ang tinurbo ni Boss!” He was referring to Eileen.

Sa likod ng van, habang ang mga kamay at paa niya ay papigil na hawak ng mga lalaki, halinhinan siyang ginahasa ng anim. Nagmamakaawa si Eileen na tama na, hindi niya na kaya, pero bingi sa kanyang pagsusumamo ang mga hayok sa laman na tauhan ni Mayor.

Nang tapos na sa kanya ang anim, lumuhod si Eileen at nagmakaawang huwag siyang patayin. Pero, muli, bingi sa kanyang pagsusumamo ang mga kriminal na tauhan ni Mayor.

Binaril siya sa mukha gamit ang armalite na ipinangpatay kay Allan.

Sumakay ang anim sa ambulansya at iniwan nila sa tubuhan ang Tamaraw van na kinalululanan ng katawan ni Eileen.

Yurak.

Duguan.

Walang buhay.

Habang nasa sasakyan, masaya pa nilang pinagkwentuhan ang mga karumal-dumal nilang ginawa ng gabing yun.

Kinabukasan, isa sa mga tauhang ‘yun ni Mayor ang kasama sa nag-imbestiga sa kaso. Siya ang nakaupong deputy chief of police ng Calauan.

Ngayon, sabihin mo sa akin, Sen. Bato.

Hindi ba demonyong maituturing si Antonio Sanchez at ang kanyang mga tauhan?

Kung kayo ang magulang ni Eileen o ni Allan, ano ang mararamdaman mo kung may magsasabi sa iyo that the mayor deserves a second chance?

Papayagan mo bang makasalamuhang muli sa ating mga komunidad ang kagaya ni Antonio Sanchez at ng kanyang mga tauhan?

Good conduct ikamo?

In 2006, a complaint was filed against him for possessing shabu and marijuana inside his jail cell.

In 2010, 1.5M worth of shabu was confiscated inside his cell during a random check. Nagpositibo rin siya sa drug test.

In 2015, nahulihan siya ng mga contrabands katulad ng aircon, flat-screen tv at ref.

Hindi niya rin binayaran ang mga Sarmenta at Gomez ng mahigit 12.6M na civil indemnity na itinakda ng korte.

Higit sa lahat, not even once did he show even an iota of remorse para sa heinous crimes that he orchestrated and committed. In fact, hanggang ngayon, he maintains na inosente siya sa mga ibinibintang sa kanya!

The Pasig City Regional Trial Court judge, na nagsabing it was “a plot seemingly hatched in hell,” ang nagbaba ng hatol kay Mayor na 7 terms of reclusion perpetua. Idagdag pa riyan ang 2 terms of reclusion perpetua rin na inihatol sa kanya para sa murder ng mag-amang Nelson at Rickson Peñalosa, supporters ng political opponent ni Mayor.

9 life sentences. Ang reclusion perpetua ay nangangahulugan ng pagkakakulong ng hanggang 40 years.

You do the math.

Makatarungan bang palayain siya after only 24-26 years in prison?

Isa pa, accdg to RA 10592 (or the Good Conduct Time Allowance (GCTA) law, “recidivists, habitual delinquents, escapees and persons charged with heinous crimes are excluded from the coverage of this Act.” Ang rape at murder po are both considered heinous crimes. At si Sanchez ay habitual delinquent bilang preso.

3
Salvador Panelo was one of Sanchez’s defense lawyers in the 1993 rape-murder case of UPLB student Eileen and the torture and death of her companion Allan Gomez.

Huwag na nating banggitin dito na ang abogado ni Mayor Sanchez noon ay ang kagalang-galang na presidential spokesperson ngayon na si Sal Panelo. Wala naman daw kasing bearing yun.

That’s all for now, senator Bato. Goodluck to you!

 

Nagpapaalala lang po,

Ang Taumbayan

AN OPEN LETTER TO MY TATAY DIGONG

Dear Tatay  Digong,

Marami po akong naririnig na negative things na sinasabi nila laban sa iyo at, bilang isa sa iyong 103-milyong mga anak, nasasaktan ako. Sino po ba namang anak ang gugustuhing matawag ang kanyang ama na psychopath, sociopath, demagogue, misogynist, pathological liar, murderer at plunderer? Wala po siguro. Subalit, ngayon, halos buong mundo ang tumutuligsa sa iyo dahil sa inyong mga kilos at pananalita. At, sadly, pati ang pagtingin nila sa ating bansa at sa mga Pilipino ay apektado.

Dati po, kilala ang Pilipinas bilang “Asia’s bastion of Christianity.” When foreigners would describe us, lagi nilang sinasabi na ang mga Pinoy ay mabait, masayahin, matulungin, madasalin at magiliw sa mga panauhin. Ngayon, may reputasyon na tayo bilang bastos, bayolente at kriminal.

Tatay, tanggap ko po na sanay kayo sa “gutter language.” Hindi nyo po inilihim sa amin ‘yan kahit na noong panahon ng kampanya. Pero nangako po kayo sa amin na, once elected at bilang respeto sa iyong posisyon bilang Ama ng Bansa, you will become dignified. Ang sabi mo pa nga, “cussing will be a thing of the past.” So, ano po ang nangyari? Mula sa Pope, sa mga Presidente at Ambassadors ng iba’t-ibang nasyon, hanggang sa mga journalists, human rights advocates, mga kalaban sa politika at kaparian — lahat sila ay nakatikim ng iyong infamous na pagmumura. Hanggang ngayon, sa mga public appearances nyo, hindi pwedeng hindi ka magmura.

Tinitingala ka namin, Tatay, at itinuturing na aming role model. Sana po, mas maganda ang mga naririnig naming salita mula sa ‘yo. Isa pa po, cursing the other heads of state will foster animosity between their countries and ours. Bilang isang third-world country pa naman, alam nyo po na hindi natin kayang mag-survive without the help of our allies. Hinay-hinay lang po, Tatay.

Sabi din po nila, wala kayong “Palabra de Honor.” Mahilig daw po kayong magbitiw ng mga pangakong alam nyo namang imposible nyong matupad.

Nangako kayo that you will “solve our traffic woes in 100 days.” Tatay, walong buwan na po kayo sa Malacanang pero ang traffic sa EDSA, lumala pa. Pangako nyo rin that you will fight “patronage politics” pero pinayagan nyo ang paglilibing kay Macoy sa Libingan Ng Mga Bayani, ang pagpapalaya kay GMA, ang pagpapatakas kay Peter Lim, ang pangangamkam ng China sa pinag-aagawang bahagi ng West Philippine Sea, at ang pagtatalaga ng mga showbiz personalities sa gobyerno. Totoo po na lahat sila ay nakatulong sa iyong kampanya pero, sana po, huwag ma-compromise ang kapakanan ng bansa sa pagnanais nyong makabayad ng utang na loob sa kanila. Country above all else po dapat, hindi ba?

Galit po kayo sa corruption, at hinahangaan ko po kayo dahil diyan. Pinagbantaan nyo pa nga dati ang mga corrupt officials na ihahagis nyo sila mula sa helicopter in mid-air, di po ba? E bakit nasa gabinete nyo pa po si Justice Sec. Aguirre? Very obvious naman during the senate investigation na plano nyang mag-extort ng pera mula kina Jack Lam. Pumutok lang ang issue kaya naghugas-kamay na lang siya. Si Sen. Pacquiao, malaki po ang atraso nya sa BIR. At si Sen. Cayetano, saang kamay ng Diyos po kaya niya nakuha ang malaking pera that he donated for your campaign?

Itong si Sen. Trillanes po, he claims na may hawak siyang mga documents proving na nagkaroon ng around P2.2 billion in deposit transactions sa bank accounts nyo. Para po mapahiya at tuluyan nang manahimik si Trillanes, bakit hindi na lang po kayo pumirma at mag-issue sa mga banko nyo ng waiver ng bank secrecy? That would effectively put to rest all these corruption allegations against you, Tatay.

Just the other day, during the celebration of International Women’s Day, you vowed to uphold gender equality. Mapaninindigan nyo po ba talaga ‘yan, Tatay, o isa na naman ‘yan sa marami mong rhetorical statements? Alam naman nating lahat na lagi nyong ipinagmamalaki ang pagiging matinik nyo sa chicks, na kesyo kaya nyong pagsabay-sabayin ang ilang babae sa buhay nyo. Hindi po ba’t isa nga ‘yan sa mga dahilan kung bakit nag-file ng annulment of marriage ang dati nyong asawa?

During the campaign, napulaan kayo dahil sa insensitive nyong comment about the Australian missionary na ginang-rape at pinatay ng mga preso. Kumalat din ang mga pictures nyo na nagpapaupo kayo sa hita at nanghahalik ng mga female supporters nyo. Nang naging Pangulo naman kayo, isa sa mga unang naging kontrobersya laban sa inyo ay ang pagpito nyo sa isang female reporter during a press conference. Hayan tuloy, sa Hollywood tv show na “Madam Secretary,” pinalabas nilang bastos ang Presidente ng Pilipinas. Kahiya-hiya po tayo sa buong mundo. Pero hindi po natin sila masisisi. Depictment lang po iyun ng kung ano ang mga naisusulat at napapanood tungkol sa inyo.

You also seem intimidated by strong women, especially women who have the balls to stand up to you. Nariyan sina Sen. De Lima (na hindi kayo tinantanan for your alleged human rights violations mula noong kayo pa ang Mayor ng Davao), SC Chief Justice Sereno (na kinwestyun ang paglalabas mo sa publiko ng mga pangalan ng mga “narco-judges”), Ombudsman Carpio-Morales (na pinaghinalaan mong siyang nagbigay ng go-signal na isiwalat ang iyong di-umano’y multibillion-peso bank accounts noong panahon ng kampanya), VP Robredo (na walang-tigil sa pagpuna sa mga patayan under your War on Drugs) at UN Special Rapporteur Agnes Callamard (na gustong imbistigahan ang spate of unlawful killings na nangyayari under your administration). Dahil parang hindi nyo alam how to deal with strong women like them, you resort to insult and threat. Tila, you want to humiliate them. You want to break them. You want to silence them. You want to control them.

FILIPPINE_-_0510_-_Presidente
Photo credit: mironline.ca

Tatay, sa palagay nyo po ba, kung buhay pa ngayon ang inyong ina ay ikatutuwa niya ang mga ginagawa nyo sa mga kabaro nya? O ang pagpayag nyong mailibing sa LNMB ang diktador na si Marcos? Malamang po, hindi. Alam naman po natin na matapang niyang nilabanan ang lahat ng uri ng pang-aabuso noong panahon ng Martial Law, di ba?

Siguro po, dahil sa pagtingala din sa inyo bilang kanilang ehemplo kaya may mga supporters kayo na nangharass online dati sa mga kabataang babae na nakilahok sa protest rally against the controversial Marcos burial. Tatay, ganyan kalaki ang inyong kapangyarihan at impluwensya sa amin. Kaya kung gusto nyong maging magalang kami, sana po, maging mabuting modelo ka sa amin.

During your speeches, lagi nyo rin pong sinasabi na alam nyo ang ginagawa nyo dahil kayo ay dating abogado. Pero sa bibig nyo na rin po nanggaling that, when you were a city prosecutor in Davao, you used to plant evidence to help the authorities when going after criminals. Tatay, hindi po ako abogado pero sigurado po ako na ang ganoong gawain ay labag sa batas. Alam ko rin po na may batas tayo laban sa bribery. So bakit hindi nyo po kinasuhan ang Mighty Corp na, ayon kay Mr. Salvador Panelo, ay sinubukan kayo dating suhulan? Katulad ng claim ni DA Sec. Manny Piñol na binigyan siya ng isang malaking agricultural company ng Rolex watch worth P450k, ng claim ni Justice Sec. Aguirre na sinuhulan diumano ni dating Sen. Jamby Madrigal at Binan Rep. Alonte ng P100 million ang mga convicted druglords to recant their testimonies against Sen. De Lima, at ng claim ni Sec. Andanar na binayaran daw ng $1,000 ang mga reporters who covered the presscon of self-confessed DDS leader Lascañas. Totoo po ba ang mga claims at allegations na ‘yun, o produkto lang lahat ng fake news?

Tatay, you are aware how sensitive the Filipinos are sa usapin ng Martial Law. Marami pa pong sugat ang hindi naghihilom mula sa madilim at mapanupil na mga taon ng pamumuno nina Marcos. Kaya, sana po, huwag mong gagamiting banta ang pagdi-declare mo ng Martial Law under any circumstance. Ginagawa mo kaming parang mga bata na tinatakot mo when we step out of line. Hindi po nakakatuwa ang ganun, Tatay.

Naniniwala po ako na matapang ka pero bahag daw po ang buntot mo kapag China na ang kaharap mo. During the campaign, ang sabi mo, magji-jet ski ka papuntang Spratly, itatanim mo ang bandila natin doon at hahamunin mo ang mga Intsik sa suntukan o barilan. Bakit po ganun? Ngayon na kinakamkam nila ang malaking bahagi ng West Philippine Sea, biglang wala kayong magagawa dahil superpower sila? Tatay, teritoryo at kasarinlan po natin ang pinag-uusapan at ipinaglalabanan dito; ang lupain na iiwanan natin sa ating mga anak at sa kanilang mga anak. Huwag nyo naman pong isuko nang ganung kadali lamang ito lalo pa nga’t based on the ruling na ipinalabas noong isang taon ng Arbitral Tribunal ng United Nations, naipanalo po natin ang ating arbitration case against China. Tayo po ang may exclusive sovereign rights sa West Philippine Sea!

Nang nagsalita kayo sa harap ng ating mga kababayan na nasa Myanmar, sinabi po ninyo that you are against same-sex marriage dahil ayon po sa inyo, aside from our Civil Code, Katoliko tayo. Kung saan po kamo tayo ipinwesto ng Diyos, dapat doon lang tayo. Seryoso ka ba sa statement mong ‘yun, Tatay, o nagbibiro ka lang? Dati po kasi, namumula ako sa ginagawa mong pagmumura at pambabatikos sa Simbahang Katolika. Tapos, ngayon, ang paniniwala ng Katolika ang gagamitin mong sandata laban sa apela ng mga members ng LGBT community? Isa pa po, ito ang linya nyo during the campaign, “Same sex marriage is good. Everyone deserves to be happy.” Ano po ang nangyari? Sinabi nyo lang ba yun dati to secure their votes? That is not so good, Tatay.

During that same speech, sinabi nyo rin po na safe na sa Pilipinas. Sa punto pong iyon, I’m sure na nagjo-joke lang kayo.

Let me remind you, Tatay, that under your War on Drugs, mahigit 7,000 na ang namamatay ayon sa official report ng PNP. May mga “suspected” drug offenders, may mga cases of mistaken identity, at may mga bystanders – either during legitimate police operations o by rogue police officers o vigilantes na masyadong siniseryoso ang call nyo to “slaughter them all.” Just today, I heard the news about a Chemical Engineering magna cum laude graduate from UP Los Banos na bigla na lang nawalang parang bula. Nag-aabang siya ng sasakyan at 4 am dahil first day of work nya sa kumpanyang inaplayan niya. Meron rin pong isang 20-year-old na lalaki ang dinukot ng mga naka-bonnet na assailants at isinakay sa isang van na walang plaka. Ang lalaking yun ay papunta lang sa drug store para bumili ng gamot dahil may sakit ang kanyang baby. Safe ba kanyo?

Alam nyo po, everytime na lumalabas ng bahay ang mga anak ko, kinakabahan at natatakot ako. Pero, bilang ina, ang kaya ko lang pong gawin ay ang pabaunan sila ng mga habilin: (1) Huwag makikipagtinginan sa mga pulis; (2) Lalayo sa mga naka-motorsiklo, lalo na kapag riding in tandem o nakasuot ng bonnet; (3) Kapag naka-witness sila ng krimen, tumakbo palayo; at (4) Kapag namamaga ang mata nila dahil sa magdamagang pagre-review, magsuot ng colored glasses. Mabuti na po ang nag-iingat, ‘di po ba? Baka mapagbintangan silang drug addict, bigla na lang itumba at takpan ng placard na nagsasabing, “Addict ako, huwag tularan.” Hindi ko po kakayanin kapag nangyari sa isa sa mga anak ko ang ganun.

Isa pa po sa mga naririnig ko is that you cannot tolerate criticism. Kaya nga po yata galit na galit kayo sa ipinadalang video message ni VP Leni sa UN Commission on Narcotic Drugs ay dahil isiniwalat nya ang mga totoong kaganapan sa bansa dahil sa inyong War on Drugs. Masyado kamong “atat” sa posisyon si VP. At part lang kamo ang lahat ng ‘yan (pati na rin ang Impeachment Complaint na inihain laban sa inyo) ng destabilization plot against your administration. Tatay, sa tingin ko po, hindi na kailangan ang ibang tao to destabilize your government. Kayo lang po — kasama ang inyong mga kaalyado na sina House Speaker Alvarez, Senate Pres. Pimentel, Justice Sec. Aguirre, PNP Chief Dela Rosa, Solicitor General Calida, Senators Pacquiao, Sotto, Gordon at Cayetano, mga appointees na sina Cesar Montano, Perfecto Yasay at Mocha Uson, at ang mga ka-DDS ko at mga bayarang trolls — ay sapat na to do the job effectively. Self-destructing nga raw po ang administrasyon nyo e.

Finally po, Tatay, nakikiusap ako sa inyo. Stop inciting emotional chaos. Temper your emotions lalo na kapag nasa harap kayo ng publiko. And don’t try to silence the opposition. Dapat nga po, you welcome dissent dahil ‘yun ang katunayan na buhay ang demokrasya sa ilalim ng iyong pamumuno.

‘Tay, I really hope and pray that you will soon start acting like the unifying and dignified President that you promised us you will be. The country deserves nothing less.

Nagmamalasakit,

Ang inyong anak

 

PS: Don’t forget to take your meds, Tatay. Nag-iiba ang timpla nyo kapag nakaka-miss kayo e.

CHECK YOUR FACTS! (PRO-MARCOS ARGUMENTS AND CLAIMS QUASHED)

 

In his book, The Life of Reason, philosopher and novelist George Santayana wrote, “Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.”

Germans are not proud of what happened during the Holocaust and, to ensure that their people will be constantly reminded of its horrors and atrocities, and that no one will dare toy with the idea of following in Adolf Hitler’s footsteps, museums and memorials are erected all around Germany.

In the Philippines, no such museum or memorial is built to remind us of the dark days of Martial Law.

No serious efforts to educate the youth about what really transpired during Martial Law are launched.

No major actors have been put behind bars for their abusive and oppressive roles in the execution of Martial Law.

To aggravate the situation is the Filipinos’ propensity to easily forgive and forget. And those who are either “enlightened” or who have first-hand experience of the tyrannical rule of the dictator sit in complete, comfortable and prolonged silence, complacent with the assumption that Filipinos must have already learned their valuable lessons from the past and thus would, at all costs, avoid it from ever happening again.

How naïve could we be, right?

Three decades after the country succeeded in overthrowing the dictatorship, we watched in utter shock and horror as Bongbong Marcos, the scion of the late strongman and kleptocrat Ferdinand Marcos Sr., was almost elected as Vice President –a position that is a heartbeat away from the seat his father held with an iron fist for more than twenty years. Through clever deception, half-truths and outright lies, the Marcos family, their die-hard loyalists and shameless cronies managed to delude more than 14 million Filipinos into thinking that Martial Law, as we knew it, never existed.

But, of course, we know better.

We know that Martial Law is not merely a figment of someone’s wild and delusional imagination. It is not some legend or an old wives’ tale. Martial Law is real. And it is up to us to join hands and counter the revisionist accounts being peddled and spread in social media.

In a humble effort to answer this urgent call, I hereby listed some statements and frequently-asked questions that aim to discredit the truth, and answered them to the best of my ability.

from-malacanang-tumbler-small

 

Shouldn’t the Marcos rule, which was characterized by a great economy, a myriad of infrastructure projects, and peace and order, be considered the golden era of the Philippine history?

No, the Marcos years should not be considered the golden age of our history!

From 1962 to 1986 (the period before Marcos became president up to the year he was ousted from Malacanang), the country’s total external debt grew from $360 million to $28.3 billion –debts we will pay until year 2025. Peso-dollar exchange rate also surged from P3.50 to a dollar in 1966 to P20.53 to a dollar in 1986. Poverty rate when he first took office in 1965 was 41%. It was 58.9% in 1985, a year before he was ousted. Moreover, our gross domestic product (the total amount of products and services produced in the country) dropped from 3.4% in 1966 to 1.4% in 1986. We fared poorly compared to our Southeast Asian neighbors. From the second richest nation in Asia, we became “The Sick Man of Asia”.

To justify the country’s skyrocketing external debt, the regime embarked on an infrastructure spending spree. All those infrastructure projects, though, were over-priced to accommodate the Marcoses and their cronies’ kickbacks. They also blatantly and wantonly plundered the public coffers and ransacked and sequestered huge local companies until they had almost drained the country and its people of all their resources. PCGG pegged at US$10 billion the total amount of the ill-gotten wealth amassed by the Marcos family during their 21-year reign of terror. Of that amount, only US$4 billion had been confiscated and returned to the treasury. The remaining US$6 billion is yet to be recovered.

Industrialization was neglected under Marcos. Although the Marcos era is remembered by many as an age of industrialization, it was characterized by “crony capitalism” where Marcos’ closest allies were awarded industries and ambitious industrial projects, many of which ended up being inefficient or bankrupt. International Monetary Fund’s Philip Gerson said, “Only Marcos cronies got rich during his rule. The rich got richer, while the poor got poorer.”

Also, the martial law years resulted in poor work conditions as testified by the sharp rise in underemployment which, at one point, afflicted a third of the employed. This dissatisfaction in the labor force (especially among skilled workers) later gave rise to the widespread growth of the OFW phenomenon after 1986. (Read this.)

Prior to his declaration of Martial Law, Marcos suspended the writ of habeas corpus (The writ serves as a safeguard against warrantless arrests and illegal detentions). Freedom of the press, freedom of speech, freedom of expression and freedom of assembly were suppressed. Political leaders, student activists, journalists, church personalities, and virtually anybody who dared challenge the people in power or were simply deemed enemies of the state were arrested, tortured, raped or killed. Friends and relatives of the 882 desaparecidos or victims of enforced disappearances gave up hope of ever seeing their loved ones again.

 

Why is Marcos portrayed as a villain? He is the country’s greatest president ever!

No, he is not! He was a despot, a tyrant, a demagogue, a dictator, a mass murderer, a torturer and a plunderer.

Under Martial Law, 70,000 were incarcerated, 35,000 were tortured, and 3,257 were killed. Historian and writer Alfred McCoy wrote, “the Marcos government appears, by any standard, exceptional for both the quantity and quality of its violence.”

According to the Transparency International Global Corruption Report 2004, Marcos is the world’s second most corrupt leader of all time.


Marcos only declared Martial Law to enforce law and order.

Limited by the 1935 Constitution to only two terms, Marcos declared Martial Law in 1972 and made a new Constitution to legitimize his extended rule. He ruled as the Philippine president for 21 years. His claim that he felt the need to declare ML because the country was threatened by the Communist and the Moro rebels was without basis. From only a handful in 1969, the number of NPA rebels reached 25,000 during his regime because of the human rights abuses and the worsening socio-economic condition during that time.

 

The Marcoses were rich even before FM became president.

Marcos was not born rich. His father was a lawyer-politician in the province allegedly killed by the Philippine troops for being a Japanese collaborator (Makapili or Filipino traitor) during the war. Regarding the Marcoses’ claim that he made his fortune from the gold taken from the Japanese, former Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (BSP) Gov. Gabriel Singson had this to say. “It was impossible for the Marcoses to have had 4,000 tons of gold as Imelda once claimed in a newspaper. The BSP only had 650 tons of gold reserves during the Marcos years.

 

Marcos has been dead for 17 years now. Can’t we just forgive him?

It is easy to ask someone to forgive, especially if you have not been a victim of the same offenses committed against that person. It is easy to tell someone to move on if you have not experienced the same physical pains, emotional trauma and psychological anguish that that person had been forced to endure. It is easy to advise someone to forget if you have not been arrested, abducted, detained, tortured, raped or stigmatized, or if you have not lost a loved one to a heinous crime.

More so, it is difficult to heal without justice.

What we need before we, as a nation, can really forgive and heal from the horrors and nightmares of Martial Law is a full accounting of the perpetrators’ sins (stolen money, corruption of our social institutions, economic sabotage, and human rights violations). Then, we demand from them (or their families) acceptance or acknowledgment of the injustices perpetrated during Martial Law. We also demand remorse and restitution and, finally, retribution. Those are the basic prerequisites for forgiveness.

It is only then that we can accord the Marcoses and their cronies the benefit of human forgiveness, and only then can that forgiveness lead to national healing, reconciliation and peace. And, yes, closure.

marcos

 

Why should we even care about this issue? (Apathetic:) We were living a comfortable and peaceful life during Martial Law! (Millennial:) It happened years before we were born!

To the apathetic:

I can’t actually find the words that won’t betray the extreme disgust and revulsion I feel towards your kind. The world is much worse and much more dangerous because of people like you. You should just be grateful that you and your family were spared, that someone else took up the cudgels on your behalf, that people sacrificed their lives so that others like you could continue living in your little world of apathy and indifference. There’s a special place in hell reserved only for you.

To the millennials:

You are now enjoying all these liberties and rights (to watch your favorite tv show, to express your opinions on social media, to stay out until the wee hours of the morning, to criticize any official of the government, to meet with your friends, to join rallies and demonstrations, and many others) because people dared to fight the Marcos dictatorship. The least you could do is to make sure that you acquaint yourself with the country’s history –not the revised version but the accurate one, the one penned with the blood of the countless Martial Law victims. And if it’s not too much to ask, share those facts and verifiable truth with your friends.

 

Since the ouster of Marcos in 1986, our country has not progressed much. Weren’t the presidents that came after him equally guilty of betraying the people’s trust?

If you think that our life today is comparable with that during Martial Law, you must be reading only the revisionists’ accounts of history. I suggest that you expand your horizons. Or, better yet, scroll back up and read again.

All the other leaders –before, during or after Martial Law– have their own shortcomings and lapses in judgement. Whatever the post-Marcos presidents did is theirs to answer to the people. They would have their time, with history as the ultimate judge of their respective leaderships. Right now, though, the issue at hand is that of Marcos.

 

Why all this noise? Isn’t LNMB just a place for dead people?

The LNMB is no ordinary cemetery. It was established as a fitting resting place for deceased

  • Medal of Valor awardees
  • Presidents of commander-in-chief, AFP
  • Secretaries of national defense
  • AFP chiefs of staff
  • Generals/flag officers of the AFP
  • Active and retired military personnel of the AFP (including active draftees and trainees who died in line of duty, and active reservists and CAFGU Active Auxiliary who died in combat-related activities)
  • Former members of the AFP who laterally entered or joined the Philippine Coast Guard and the Philippine National Police
  • Veterans of Philippine Revolution of 1890, World War I, World War II, and recognized guerrillas
  • Government dignitaries, statesmen, national artist and other deceased persons whose interment and re-interment has been approved by the commander-in-chief, Congress or the secretary of national defense
  • Former presidents, secretaries of defense, dignitaries, statesmen, national artists, widows of former presidents, secretaries of national defense and chief of staff (Read this.)

LNMB, as its name implies, symbolizes heroism. It is in our best interest to recognize and value symbols and what they stand for. Otherwise, the flag would just be a piece of fancy cloth, the Noli and El Fili just storybooks, and the monuments and statues just overpriced slabs of rocks.


Ferdinand Marcos’ family should not be held accountable for the late president’s transgressions.

Yes, they should be. And they owe the Filipino people an apology over the Martial Law atrocities. Big time!

According to the Campaign Against the Return of the Marcoses to Malacanang (CARMMA), Imelda Marcos was the biggest Marcos crony, whose free rides in the Philippine Airlines made its debt balloon to $13.8 billion in 1986. She was also the head of the Metro Manila Commission (precursor of the Metro Manila Development Authority) which, by the end of 1985, had accumulated debts of P1.99 billion (which included $100 million in foreign loans) in its 10 years of existence.

Bongbong, meanwhile, continues to whitewash the Marcos dictatorship’s crony capitalism, of which he had been a part. In 1985, when he was 26 years old, his father appointed him chairman of the board of the Philippine Communications Satellite Corporation (Philcomsat), receiving a monthly salary of anywhere between $9,700 to $97,000. (This, despite that fact that he rarely went to the Philcomsat office.) In 1986, government auditors discovered that Philcomsat was one of the many corporations and organizations used to siphon ill-gotten wealth out of the country.

When the Marocses fled to Hawaii, US Customs inspectors found around 300 crates filled with jewelry, gold, as well as 1,500 documents described by then US Lawmaker Stephen Solarz as “an encyclopedia of corruption.” The documents included a Marcos memo to the PNB that ordered transfer of P20 million to him, a list of expenses for Imelda’s overseas trips, a memo showing deposits and interests in overseas banks amounting to $30 million, around $11.2 million in commissions from Westinghouse (the designer and builder of the Bataan Nuclear Power Plant), a listing of precious gems, deposit certificates and bearer bonds worth $4 million, as well as stock transfer deeds, bank documents, financial information about hotels,  and payments made directly to the former dictator and his wife for “Disaster Relief Projects.” Marcos was indicted in the US in 1988 for racketeering. He was accused of stealing more than $100 million to buy buildings in New York. He died later, before any verdict was handed out. (Watch this.)

Bongbong once said that, “The sins of the parents, if there are any, are not for the children to inherit.” That may be correct. It is not correct, however, to shamelessly live off the fruits of the legendary Marcos plunder while arrogantly peddling the lie that his father’s unbelievable wealth is legitimate. He also committed a grave injustice to the Martial Law victims when he said, “Pera-pera lang ang habol ng mga ‘yan”, referring to the 9,539 human rights victims in the Hawaii class suit who won the case against the Marcos estate. (Read this.)

Recently, Imee Marcos said that she cannot make a categorical admission of guilt over what happened during Martial Law because she was still “too young” then. I think, we should help Ms. Marcos refresh her failing memory by reminding her of Archimedes Trajano’s unfortunate fate. Trajano, a 21-year-old Mapua student in 1977 questioned Imee, during an open forum, on the latter’s appointment as the national chairman of the Kabataang Barangay. He was seized and dragged out of the venue by the presidential daughter’s bodyguards and, hours later, “his body was found severely tortured and beaten to death.” (Read this.)

 

As a former president and soldier, doesn’t Marcos deserve to be buried at the Libingan Ng Mga Bayani?

No, and I have four arguments to support my unequivocal answer.

First, according to no less than the National Historical Commission of the Philippines (NHCP), Marcos is unfit for a hero’s burial, stating that his records as a soldier during World War II “is fraught with myths, factual inconsistencies, and lies”. Based on the NHCP study, Marcos “lied about receiving US medals (Distinguished Service Cross, Silver Star, and Order of the Purple Heart). His guerilla unit, the Ang Mga Maharlika, his leadership of it, and his claimed rank promotion from Major to Lt. Col. were never officially recognized by the US officials. Most importantly, some of Marcos’ actions as a soldier were officially called into question by the upper echelons of the US military.” These include:

  • his command over the Allas Intelligence Unit (described as “usurpation”)
  • his commissioning of officers (without authority)
  • his abandonment of USAFIP-NL presumably to build an airfield for Gen. Roxas
  • his collection of money for the airfield (described as “illegal”)
  • his listing of his name on the roster of different units (called a “malicious criminal act”)

NHCP added that, “A doubtful record does not serve as sound, unassailable basis of historical recognition of any sort, let alone of the burial in a site intended, as its name suggests, for heroes.” (Read this.)

Secondly, according to the rules of the Armed Forces of the Philippines (AFPR G 161-375 dated 11 Sept. 2000)), Marcos, as a former president, is entitled to a cemetery plot at the LNMB. Stated on that same regulation, however, are two important conditions under which qualified personnel can be disqualified to be interred in the Libingan Ng Mga Bayani. These are:

  • Personnel who were dishonorably separated/reverted/discharged from the service
  • Personnel who were convicted by final judgement of an offense involving moral turpitude (Read this.)

Marcos cannot be disqualified on the basis of the second condition because he was never convicted by final judgment of any offense involving moral turpitude (Bouvier’s Law Dictionary defines moral turpitude as anything “which is done contrary to justice, honesty, modesty, or good morals”). Although we can cite countless offenses involving moral turpitude committed by Marcos, he died before he could be charged, tried and convicted.

But the first condition is an altogether different matter.

There is only one way for any president to be dishonorably separated, reverted or discharged, and that is by revolution of the people who, as the sovereign authority, had temporarily vested its governmental powers in that official. The EDSA or People Power Revolution of 1986 “dishonorably discharged” Marcos not only for conduct unbecoming of an officer but, most significantly, for the slew of crimes he committed during Martial Law.

Thirdly, Section 1 of the Republic Act No. 289, the statute that provides for the creation of a national pantheon for Presidents of the Philippines, National Heroes and Patriots of the country, states that a pantheon which shall be the burial place of their mortal remains (in this case, the LNMB) shall be constructed “to perpetuate the memory of all the Presidents of the Philippines, national heroes and patriots for the inspiration and emulation of this generation and generations still unborn.

The question to be asked then should be, What is it exactly about Marcos that would be worthy of inspiration and emulation?

Prof. Winnie Monsod has this to say. Is it “his forcing himself on the Filipino people for 13 more years after his last term had expired? His stealing from the people (P170 billion, and still counting)? His being considered the second most corrupt leader in the world? His abuse of powers to incarcerate his opponents? His violations of human rights? His cheating in the 1986 “snap” election—the final straw for the Filipino people?”

Finally, Imelda Marcos was made to sign an agreement with the government when they were allowed to bring to the country the late dictator’s remains in 1992. The four conditions thus expressly stipulated in the agreement were:

  • the body was to be flown directly to Ilocos
  • Marcos would be given honors as a Major, his last rank in military service
  • Marcos’ body was not to be paraded in Metro Manila
  • Marcos was not to be buried at the Libingan Ng Mga Bayani, but in Batac, Ilocos Norte, beside his mother (as apparently requested by him)

We all know that the Marcoses, being Marcoses, did not feel the need to comply with those conditions.

The body was not buried but put on a refrigerated display for more than 13 years. Apparently, the family was waiting for a “friendly” president to come along –a president who would grant their wish of immortalizing their patriarch at the Libingan. Well, they finally got it when Duterte won the presidency. On November 18, 2016, in a sneaky attempt to elude the outrage of the Filipino people, the Marcoses snuck in into the LNMB the late dictator’s  body for a secret burial. According to anti-Marcos activists, it was clearly an unscrupulous move to preempt their appeal of the SC’s decision. (The group already filed with the Supreme Court a manifestation that they will be appealing the latter’s decision to allow the burial, and the petitioners were supposed to have 15 days to do it.)

According to Albay Rep. Edcel Lagman, “This is a continuing deception and underhandedness of the Marcos family and they are just continuing the abuses and atrocities committed during Martial Law.”

Sen. Risa Hontiveros couldn’t have said it better. “There is no grave, no mausoleum, no decision of any court or order from any president that will keep the truth that Marcos is not a hero.” Also, I wonder what the Marcoses would have felt when, at the end of the military gun salute and when the triangular-folded flag was handed over to them, these words were spoken, “on behalf of a grateful nation…”

20161111-anti-marcos-uplb-cq-1

 

The Supreme Court has already decided. Shouldn’t that decision put an end to all these protests?

I read this somewhere. “Apartheid was legal, the Holocaust was legal, Slavery was legal, Colonialism was legal.” And now, with the nine SC justices’ affirmative votes, the burial of the late dictator Marcos at the LNMB is also legal. Clearly, legality does not establish morality.

The Supreme Court decision is an utter “disregard to the historic truths and legal principles that persist after Marcos’ death,” Chief Justice Maria Lourdes Sereno said.

The SC, as well as the international judicial tribunals, in several decisions in the past have acknowledged and documented the plunder and human rights violations committed by Marcos. It was because of this very acknowledgment that our present Constitution was framed in such a way that out rights are tightly safeguarded, democratic practices and principles are ensured, and the possibility of another Martial Law would be subject to the most stringent of requirements. It was also because of this very acknowledgment that the State recognizes its moral and legal obligation to provide reparation to the Martial Law victims through the RA No. 10368 or the Reparation of the Human Rights Victims Law. Finally, if was because of this very acknowledgment that the PCGG was tasked to recover the billions of dollars that comprise the Marcoses’ ill-gotten wealth.

With its controversial decision, SC had somehow contradicted all their earlier decisions that suggest that Marcos was a plunderer and human rights violator.

Also, the Supreme Court chose to scrutinize the technicalities of the petitioners’ arguments rather than contemplate the latter’s fervent appeal for truth and justice when it asserts that the case should have been filed first with the proper RTC and when it maintains that the LNMB is not a national shrine but is merely a military shrine. It also claims that the interment will not, in any way, confer upon Marcos the status of a hero because the purpose of LNMB, despite its name, is “neither to confer to the people buried there the title of hero nor to require that only those interred therein should be treated as a hero.” It also alleges in its decision that the matter of contention has become a political issue.

How could the Supreme Court be that insensitive? Part of their mandate as an independent, impartial, effective and efficient Judiciary is to defend the welfare of the people and to protect their rights.

The Supreme Court further declares that “Marcos should be viewed and judged in his totality as a person. While he was not all good, he was not pure evil either. Certainly, just a human who erred like us.” (I know, I also had difficulty believing that these words were penned by our judicious magistrates.)

But we have to remember that the SC justices are just men and women who could be as fallible and corruptible as any of us. They could also commit grave mistakes. And, definitely, they and their decisions are not beyond reproach.

 

Pres. Duterte has been elected into office by an overwhelming landslide win. We, the voters through our votes, authorized him to do what he promised during the campaign he would do should he win.

I swear, this argument did not come from an unsophisticated mind of a troll. This came from no less than Salvador Panelo, the Chief Legal Counsel of Pres. Duterte (yes, he is the same man who lawyered for these personalities: Marcoses on the cases of ill-gotten wealth against them, Andal Ampatuan, Jr. on the Maguindanao massacre case, Bong Revilla, Jr. on his PDAF plunder and graft cases, former Laguna Mayor Antonio Sanchez on the double murder case of two UPLB students, former Comelec Chairman Benjamin Abalos on the electoral sabotage case, Philip Medel on the murder case of actress Nida Blanca, Deniece Cornejo on her rape case against Vhong Navarro, Dennis Roldan on the kidnapping case of a Chinoy boy, and of course, Pres. Duterte on the case of hidden wealth filed against him by Sen. Trillanes.)

Anyway, to answer his argument, I did not vote for Duterte, and his vocal position on the Marcos burial at the LNMB was one of the reasons why. However, when he won the election, I endeavored to respect the choice of the greater number of voters while making a vow to be vigilant with my duties to question, to guard, to challenge and to seek truth and justice at all times.

It is in keeping with that vow that I am questioning the reason behind the President’s decision to allow that burial.

According to the SC decision, it is because of his desire for national healing and reconciliation (which I wrote above is not feasible without meeting the basic requirements for forgiveness) –a statement which is not in harmony with his public pronouncements on the subject. His decision is borne out of his desire to fulfill his promise to the Marcoses during campaign and as a payback for his debt of gratitude to Imee Marcos for financially supporting his presidential bid.

He also said that the issue over the burial is a fight between two families. With that single carelessly-thrown statement, he was able to reduce the Filipinos’ struggles for two decades, the fear and horror and nightmare of Martial Law, the lives lost and the billions of dollars plundered from our coffers, into one inconsequential, capricious issue that requires minimum scrutiny and deliberation.

Another one of his reasons is because Marcos “was a soldier. He was there to fight for his country. Even if he is not a hero, he is a Filipino and he is, once upon a time, a president. That’s the law, we cannot go out of the law. I am not dwelling on his exploits.” Let me answer this with a statement from someone who is adept at history. Maria Serena Diokno, the Chairman of the National Historical Commission of the Philippines (NHCP) who resigned following the controversial burial, said “The justice of history, anchored on historical truth, is far greater than that which any court, including the highest court of the land, can render (or in this case, fail to render). As President of our Republic, you have the unique opportunity and obligation to heed the demands of the justice of History, and thereby lead the way to true healing.”

As for me, let me leave the President with this image

15086316_1130486717033908_665903145_n

…and the readers with this message:

Wake up, kabayan! Fight historical revisionism NOW.

Tomorrow may be too late.

 http://www.rappler.com/views/imho/124682-marcos-economy-golden-age-philippines

http://news.abs-cbn.com/focus/v2/09/21/14/life-under-marcos-fact-check

https://www.scribd.com/document/330360599/AFP-Regulation-Allocation-of-Cemetery-Plots-at-the-Libingan-ng-mga-Bayani?secret_password=kyAUvy7WRFJSQznwFOno#fullscreen&from_embed

https://carmmaph.wordpress.com/tag/bong-bong-marcos/

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B9c6mrxI4zoYS2I0UWFENEp6TkU/view

http://www.filipiknow.newt/lesser-known-martial-law-photos/

 

 

 

HE WAS ADVISED. HE JUST NEVER LISTENS.

On their radio program, anchors Anthony Taberna and Gerry Baja said the other day that only those who voted for President Duterte during the last election have the right to criticize him.

Duh! Seryoso ba ang dalawang payaso na ‘to?

Totoo nga that the President was installed into power by more than 16 million voters. Totoo rin that he won with a wide margin of victory over the other candidates. Subalit kahit na ang numerong ito constitutes only 15% of our total population, si Rodrigo Duterte, under our Constitution, ang kinikilala at dapat talagang kilalaning Pangulo ng ating bansa. Ang ibig sabihin, he is the president, not only of his 16M supporters, but of the 102M Filipinos in the country. And, as such, he is accountable to all of us.

If there’s one adjective that would fit President Duterte to a T, it would have to be “unpredictable”. And this unpredictability is what’s landing us to a lot of trouble these past 100 days.

During speeches, no one from the Presidential Communications Operations Office (PCOO) has any idea kung ano ang mga sasambitin ng Pangulo o kung kanino nakasentro ang kanyang hard-hitting commentaries and pronouncements. Tulad nating mga pangkaraniwang mamamayan, the PCOO people and the presidential spokespersons are nothing more than engrossed spectators. Nahihimasmasan lamang sila and are galvanized into action once the President is done with his tirades and they need to consolidate all their efforts to, somehow, weaken the adverse impact of Digong’s words.

Paano kamo? Ganito po.

They explain his latest pronouncement as something made in jest or due to the rush of emotion or heat of the moment.

They make his remarks more palatable for public consumption by deodorizing, sanitizing and sterilizing his words. If these do not work, they resort to sugar-coating or twisting.

They interpret his statements to ensure that they will not be misunderstood, misinterpreted, misquoted, taken out of context, or lost in translation.

They make appeals to the media and the public for deeper understanding for the noble motives behind those pronouncements.

They make people understand that those remarks could be adversely affected by the President’s foul mood, other human frailties, or even by the time of day the speech was made.

They introduce and acclimatize the people to Duterte speak and hyperboles, sarcasm and slips of the tongue.

They encourage people to learn the fine arts of reading Digong’s mind and deciphering his every word, and of using their “creative imagination” in interpreting his remarks. Sabi pa nga ni presidential spokesperson Ernesto Abella, “Let us not be literal.”

They make swift rebuttals to the criticisms made by the “yellows”, the “bleeding hearts”, and the “hypocrites”.

1pc
The presidential apologists and interpreters. (PCOO Sec. Martin Andanar is not in the picture). Photo credit: professionalheckler.files

Pero sa maraming pagkakataon, all these efforts do not work.

With his dirty mouth and controversial stances, President Duterte has successfully antagonized the United States, the European Union, the United Nations, the Christians all over the world, the Jewish community, the human and women’s rights advocates, the local and international media, the Martial Law victims and their families, and pretty much the international community.

In this age of globalization, I dread the possibility of the Philippines being a hermit kingdom. Apparently, hindi ako nag-iisa. Marami pa rin ang naglalakas-loob na punahin ang Presidente sa kabila ng pag-aalala na sapitin din nila ang naging kapalaran ng mga kritiko ni Pangulong Duterte, kagaya nina Sen. De Lima, CJ Maria Lourdes Sereno, US Pres. Obama, UN special Rapporteur for summary executions Agnes Callamard, UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon, Commission on Human Rights Chairperson Chito Gascon, mga Obispo at kaparian, at marami pang iba. (I am still awaiting kung ano ang mangyayari kina Agot Isidro at Edgar Matobato.)

I read somewhere that in this world of Mocha Usons, we should salute the likes of Agot Isidros who stand up, speak up, and make sure that their voices are heard.

mocha-uson-4-696x393
Photo credit: newsfeed.ph

Here are the pieces of advice from some of the people who, like Agot Isidro, dared.

GMA’s Cabinet Sec. Ignacio Bunye: Please, Mr. President. Immediately renounce your Japanese citizenship. Stop being Rodrigo Nakamura. No more talk about abolishing Congress. No more talk about your dislike for Catholic prelates. And control that dirty finger.

Former Sen. and Diplomat Leticia Ramos-Shahani: We don’t need to make enemies to make new friends and that is the art of diplomacy. So I think, our President, if I may have to say so, has to take a beginner’s course in diplomacy.

Former National Security Adviser Jose Almonte: Based on what is done in the [present administration’s] last 100 days, I say it’s exceptional. [But] If he can make his colorful statements colorless, that’s a big change for me. [Also] The Philippines could remain as friends with our old allies like America, but at the same time, we can be friends with all others including enemies of America. This will be the best policy. Let’s maintain friendship with our allies but work hard to be friends to others.

Archbishop Socrates Villegas: There is virtue in silence. There is virtue in speech. Wisdom is knowing when it is time for silence and when is the timing for speech.

Albay Rep. Edcel Lagman: The President must avoid outlandish and provocative statements with detrimental consequences. The mouth must be the oracle of discreet and studied statements, not ill-conceived and outrageous utterances.

Sen. Francis “Kiko” Pangilinan: As President of our nation, he represents all 100 plus million Filipinos both here and abroad, including myself, my wife, and my children. Thus every time he speaks in public, depending on what he says and how he says it, all of us Filipinos can be affected either positively or negatively. We appeal to the President to exercise greater restraint and to choose his words carefully when he speaks out on various matters now that he is President of the entire nation and no longer just the Mayor of Davao City.

Vice-President Leni Robredo: Marami kaming mga personal na pakiramdam na hindi dapat sinasabi sa publiko dahil sa aming position. Kaya kay President, paalala lang siguro sa kanya na what he says is policy kaya maiging mas maging careful. As far as diplomacy is concerned, baka makakatulong na mas deliberate, mas pinag-iisipan bago nagsasalita.

Sen. Panfilo “Ping” Lacson: What is the point of saying sorry when, in the next vein, magsasalita ka naman ng ika-ka sorry mo? Dapat lesson ‘yan. How many times has he said sorry already? Marami-rami na rin eh.

Sen. Richard “Dick” Gordon: We have to protect the country from bad statements and the President has the duty to be a statesman. He must not be heard saying all [those] bad words.

Maingay ang Pangulo, sobrang ingay ng Pangulo. Tama lang na ipakita niya na galit siya sa droga pero huwag na siyang mag-ingay na ‘I will kill you. Hindi tama ‘yan. Kaya he is falling on his own sword, nadadapa siya sa kanyang espada dahil salita siya ng salita. Napagbibintangan tuloy ang bansa na ‘yan ang nangyayari.

Majority Floor Leader and Ilocos Norte Rep. Rodolfo Fariñas: I would advise the President, huwag na ho kayo magsalita. Magtrabaho na lang kayo. Siguro (he should not speak) until such time he gets to adjust.

Davao Archbishop Emeritus Fernando Capalla: Listen. Listen. Listen. I will tell him, “Digong, God gave us two ears and only one mouth. Which means that we have to listen twice as much as we speak. But it’s the reverse eh. That’s why we are in trouble.

I am worried about him as a friend. I think, he has a problem and we need to help him. He is in the course of self-destruction, without even knowing that he is ruining himself. If he can only listen and not talk too much, earn friends instead of enemies, he can become the greatest President of the Philippines.

[If I get to see Digong] I would say to him that what you are doing now, your mother may not like it. I’ll say also that this is not the Digong I knew.

Senate President Koko Pimentel: I won’t tell him to zip his dirty mouth entirely. He just needs to use it less often. I won’t tell him to eliminate cursing. Maybe just don’t do it 100 times. Be yourself, but everything in moderation.

Former President Fidel V. Ramos: I find our Team Philippines losing in the first 100 days of Duterte’s administration – and losing badly. This is a huge disappointment and let-down to many of us. Are we throwing away decades of military partnership, tactical proficiency, compatible weaponry, predictable logistics, and soldier-to-soldier camaraderie just like that? Ours is not to heap more brickbats on Pres. Duterte – because he has had more than enough already – but to help enable him to transform (thru his own efforts) from a mere provincial official to a capable international player at the head of 101 million multi-cultured Filipinos.

FILES-PHILIPPINES-VOTE
Photo credit: eaglenews.ph

Ang sabi ng Malacañang, hindi raw bingi ang Presidente sa payo ng kanyang mga kaalyado. Subalit, bakit ganun? Matapos ang pagpuna sa kanya ni Sen. Gordon, ito  ang kanyang naging pahayag. “You say that my mouth is not for a statesman, whoever told you I was applying for a statesman?

Hay naku, bayan. Saan ka igigiya ni Pangulong Duterte?

He was advised – many times.

He just never listens.